Re:Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressur...
by roenxi on Wednesday August 28, 2024 @01:41AM
(#41376308)
That is a powerful response against someone who I suspect you're imagining. Maybe try assuming I more or less agree with all that re-read my comment? I don't see any points of disagreement.
Nope. Not now, not then, and not in the absence of parasites.
The early pandemic studies you "recall" were real studies, meta studies that looked at the use of Ivermectin in "the Global South" in countries with high incidence of worms | parasites | etc.
These studies showed a distinct improvement in the face of COVID for treated groups .. eg: those untreated that had parasites and caught COVID Vs. those treated and caught COVID but now had immune responses uncomprimised by parasites.
more recent studies, in G20 type countries,
~ https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2801828and,
New study shows ivermectin lacks meaningful benefits in COVID-19 treatment (March, 2024)
~ https://www.phc.ox.ac.uk/news/new-study-shows-ivermectin-lac...Damn- no effect in any trial in the absence of worms.
> Bit of a tautology there, we'd expect the people who got things right to know what they were talking about in hindsight
whereas I'm talking about qualified epidemiologists who were correct then (2020) and still correct today .. the likes of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiona_Stanley (who I worked with in the 1980s) et al.