Because foie gras is defined as the liver of a duck or goose fattened by force feeding.
If the animal wasn’t force fed, it literally wouldn’t be foie gras.
Most other forms of animal cruelty in food production is because of industrialization. We could clean up many of those and still sell the products without so much mistreatment.
Foie gras can only be made by mistreating the animal. So it’s gonna be specifically called out.
Obviously this is totally marginal compared to the size of foie gras industry.
See
[1] https://honest-food.net/wild-foie-gras-is-real/
[2] https://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/food-and-wine/food-tren...
This is not true.
Presumably the above poster is referring to the viewing of the practice of boiling the lobster alive as torture.
Similarly, I ate drunken prawns in China, though I can't say for certain if those shrimp were stunned or actually dead.
Technically banned for over a decade, FYI [1].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ortolan_bunting#Legal_status
https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a4642/the-last-meal-05...
They're caught with nets, force-fed with grain, drowned in Armagnac, seasoned, and then cooked in their own fat. When you eat one, you hold onto its head and place it feet-first into your mouth, all while wearing a towel or napkin on your head to "shield from God's eyes the shame of such a decadent and disgraceful act" [0].
0: https://web.archive.org/web/20210303221803/https://www.teleg...