Its unfortunate at a larger level that the commentariat can't help but injecting their bias directly into things like this, when the facts of the story can tell you everything you need to know about the motivations of the people involved. Those facts are /weakened/ sitting alongside vituperative editorializing.
When it is a pretty straightforward recounting of an event, just give me the facts please.
Its his own site, so understandably the editorial voice is his to do what as he wills, but again, in the end I believe it undermines his own credibility with his readership, or at least sprinkle more of the opinionated voice at the beginning so I can read it in that mindset, rather than having to recast my view on the reporting post hoc.
He was very often wrong, which didn't make him hate Musk less.
[1] https://seekingalpha.com/article/4189933-tesla-and-montana-s...
[2] https://seekingalpha.com/instablog/37229846-montana-skeptic/...
The author really hates Musk.