Yes, her entire description about her experience (safe for that weirdness with the textbook sweatshop) is relatable. I am not sure what you are looking for but STEM PhD attrition rates speak for themselves. Those do not include PhDs that decide to leave academia after retrieving their PhD. Not to mention the frequently discussed mental health crisis that consistently gets Nature articles.
HN's negativity is comparable to the negativity I have seen with CS, Maths, and Physics PhDs and PostDocs in personal discussions. See also PhD comics: https://phdcomics.com/comics/archive/phd072011s.gif
If you are an idealist you will of course be worn down by the way many academic institutions are set up. There is a ton of writing on this, e.g., https://www-users.cse.umn.edu/~odlyzko/doc/decline.txt
By all measures, I was "living the life" in academia. with both my parents being academics (both researchers and pretty published in their fields)
Yet, I left it after the project finished. The prospect of having to write papers just because. The amount of trash papers I had to review for free but then looking at the cost of proceeding books (I got them for free through my institution... but what a racket it is!!)
The prospect of the "academic path" ((abitur, lecturer, associate prof and then prof) praying the stupid game..
I left it all and turned to the startup world . Maybe it was my engineer mind, but I feel way more fulfilled after 12 years in industry.
It was depressing. I dropped out. I have love for academia, but there is a pretty overwhelming amount of gamesmanship in surviving that system. I found becoming a developer a much easier career to navigate.
I am asking this because HN neems to be so much more negative of academia than what I am seeing around me.
More generally I think it is worth stressing that any site like this can be a terrible echo chamber at times. Generally there are smart people here, but on some topics I suspect that the consensus could be completely misguided.