Re:X to pay €550k to employee fired for not replying to yes-...
by gpvos on Saturday August 17, 2024 @09:31AM
(#41274462)
Assuming it is paid vacation, why is the special paperwork required? Governments over here require minimum amounts of vacation out of health concerns, but I can't imagine how giving away more or even infinite vacation days would concern them as long as the employer is happy with it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:X to pay €550k to employee fired for not replying to yes-...
by chgs on Saturday August 17, 2024 @12:03PM
(#41275475)
I could see each stint being off for more than 3 weeks would require something from the manager to confirm enough handover has happened. Waiting too 3 weeks is normal each time, but if you’re a project manager and vanish for 5 weeks at a critical part of the project then someone needs to know.
Re:X to pay €550k to employee fired for not replying to yes-...
by gpvos on Saturday August 17, 2024 @02:01PM
(#41276520)
Yeah but why would there be paperwork mandated by law?
Re:X to pay €550k to employee fired for not replying to yes-...
by chgs on Saturday August 17, 2024 @04:47PM
(#41277829)
I don’t think anyone said they did
Re:X to pay €550k to employee fired for not replying to yes-...
by gpvos on Sunday August 18, 2024 @04:46AM
(#41281065)
The question would then become why a company would impose such paperwork on itself; but someone else replied that it has to do with unions, which I guess could explain it although it's still weird.
Re:X to pay €550k to employee fired for not replying to yes-...
by chgs on Sunday August 18, 2024 @01:19PM
(#41283677)
Working for a 100 year old 5b/year company the amount of forms to fill in to do various things are extreme.
I could easily see a requirement from high up managment to “reduce risk” by having a department have a plan for an unusually long holiday stint (I.e someone taking 6 weeks off in a row), fundamentally because senior management don’t trust middle management.