Re:The Webb Telescope Further Deepens the Biggest Controvers...
by AprilArcus on Tuesday August 13, 2024 @12:02PM
(#41236712)
They'd need some very big RTGs to last that long, and I don't think we manufacture plutonium at the necessary volumes for that anymore.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Webb Telescope Further Deepens the Biggest Controvers...
by KennyBlanken on Tuesday August 13, 2024 @12:39PM
(#41237030)
Last I remember, RTG manufacturing was very constrained, period. And that was before Russia took a massive shit in Ukraine and got themselves embargo'd by most of the rest of the developed world.
Re:The Webb Telescope Further Deepens the Biggest Controvers...
by ars on Tuesday August 13, 2024 @02:22PM
(#41237984)
I would use Americium-241 instead, longer half life and much more availability.
Lower power, but a telescope like this does not need constant power, so some kind of short term power storage (capacitor I would assume, or some kind of ultra long life battery) could handle that.
Re:The Webb Telescope Further Deepens the Biggest Controvers...
by fsckboy on Tuesday August 13, 2024 @04:30PM
(#41239469)
in terms of the potential plutonium shortage, wikipedia: Americium-241 is not synthesized directly from uranium – the most common reactor material – but from the plutonium isotope 239. The latter needs to be produced first