News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple: Using alternative browser engines in the European ... by nolist_policy on Friday August 09, 2024 @04:06AM (#41199753)
Weird I would expect that iOS sandboxes apps in such a way that it doesn't have any impact on other parts of the phone even if the app is hacked.
Re:Apple: Using alternative browser engines in the European ... by Yeri on Friday August 09, 2024 @04:10AM (#41199784)
like iMessage. Oh wait :)
Re:Apple: Using alternative browser engines in the European ... by Nextgrid on Friday August 09, 2024 @06:09AM (#41200393)
iMessage runs at the system level, and there's an argument for it as it needs to run all the time to process incoming message notifications.

But I don't see why a browser should run at system level - if the app is closed, there is no reason for its code to be running.

Re:Apple: Using alternative browser engines in the European ... by illiac786 on Friday August 09, 2024 @02:25PM (#41204194)
iMessage has also been the main source of hacks for iPhones for years if not decades. Apple really struggle with securing iMessage.

It definitely does not need to run all the time, it could be woken up by incoming notification like all other apps (and I hope it is how it actually works).

Re:Apple: Using alternative browser engines in the European ... by cjpearson on Friday August 09, 2024 @05:17AM (#41200145)
Apps are sandboxed, but WebKit runs outside the sandbox with additional privileges such as JIT and multiple processes and communicates with the app through IPC. This change is allowing third-party code to also run with these privileges as long as they follow certain security standards.
Re:Apple: Using alternative browser engines in the European ... by troad on Friday August 09, 2024 @08:16AM (#41201078)
Imagine if they spent the last fifteen years hardening those privileges, rather than fighting like hell to keep everyone out of their treehouse.