I agree on how it's technically a waste of time to pursue fads, but it's also a huge PITA to have a platform that good engineers actively try to avoid, as their careers would stagnate (even as they themselves know that it's half a fad)
1. Has been at org for so long, management condones them flaunting the rules, like pushing straight to prod. Hates the "inefficiency" of open source platforms and purpose-built something "suitable for the company" by themselves, no documentation you have to ask them to fix issues because they don't accept code or suggestions from others. The DSL they developed is inconsistent and has no parser/linter.
absoutely start as simple as you can, but plan to move to a hosted kube something asap instead of writing your own base images, unless that's a differentiator for your company.
2. Fad-driven
I wonder why I don’t often see (1) critiqued on the basis of (2).