News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:RLHF is just barely RL by danpalmer on Thursday August 08, 2024 @09:33AM (#41191313)
Apologies, I guess I agree with your sentiment but disagree with the example you gave as I don't think it's well specified, and my more general point is that there isn't an effective specification, which means that in practice there isn't a clear reward function. If we can get the clear specification, which we probably can do proportionally to the complexity of the problem, and not getting very far up the complexity curve, then I would agree we can get the good reward function.
Re:RLHF is just barely RL by cs702 on Thursday August 08, 2024 @09:52AM (#41191512)
> the example you gave

Ah, got it. I was just trying to keep my comment short!