News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Systemd, 10 years later: a historical and technical retro... by gsich on Tuesday August 06, 2024 @05:53PM (#41175798)
systemd-networkd also has the big advantage in using the same config for all distributions. No weird Debian or Redhat config pain.
Re:Systemd, 10 years later: a historical and technical retro... by pantalaimon on Tuesday August 06, 2024 @06:02PM (#41175873)
And that’s why Canonical came up with Netplan because otherwise things would get boring.
Re:Systemd, 10 years later: a historical and technical retro... by jandrese on Tuesday August 06, 2024 @11:17PM (#41177930)
Yes, but then NetworkManger will override Netplan sometimes but not others. There is a setting in one of the buried config files to configure this behavior, but it doesn't always work depending on how NetworkManager is feeling that day.
Re:Systemd, 10 years later: a historical and technical retro... by rlpb on Tuesday August 06, 2024 @05:59PM (#41175845)
I'm not keen on the network config being scattered across a dozen tiny files. It makes it hard to see what's going on, or to spot a configuration error.
Re:Systemd, 10 years later: a historical and technical retro... by gsich on Tuesday August 06, 2024 @07:19PM (#41176564)
Also true.