News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Minimum Viable CD by ramesh31 on Monday August 05, 2024 @10:21AM (#41161610)
>Trunk-based Development

I'm curious if anyone is still using git-flow? It seems like the entire industry just unanimously (although quietly) agreed that it was a bad idea and abandoned it.

Re:Minimum Viable CD by datadrivenangel on Monday August 05, 2024 @10:49AM (#41161895)
Many larger enterprises are using git flow style processes but calling it trunk based?

Lots of incentives towards longer lived feature branches

Re:Minimum Viable CD by eddd-ddde on Monday August 05, 2024 @11:17AM (#41162159)
What are the incentives you mention?

Anytime I've worked on long lived branches chaos is doomed to ensue.

Re:Minimum Viable CD by przemo_li on Wednesday August 07, 2024 @08:27AM (#41180676)
There is huge array of alternatives between git-flow and trunk based development.

Most still miss on benefits TBD and CI bring.

Companies settle in the middle because git-flow is very specialized branching strategy. You almost need physically sold software (but that's still not enough!).