News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Open Source Farming Robot by TheDong on Sunday August 04, 2024 @03:36AM (#41151749)
"other factors" can be treated as a singular group noun if you want, so I think both are correct.

By example:

"There are likely to be cows over that hill" - correct, many cows

"There is likely to be a herd of cows over that hill" - correct, one herd

"There are likely to be other factors" - correct, many factors

"There is likely to be a number of other factors" - correct, one collection of many factors

"There are likely to be a number of other factors" - correct, emphasizes the factors over the collection

"There are likely to be other factors" - correct if you want to treat 'other factors' as a singular group. Up for debate.

Also, "there're" is very hard to say, so using "there's" as a contraction for "there are" is, in my book, okay, even if it's not technically correct.

Re:Open Source Farming Robot by efilife on Sunday August 04, 2024 @11:08AM (#41154016)
I agree with all of your examples. But his sentence misses the crucial to be part to be correct. I'm just wondering whether this is deliberate and just a way of speaking informal english, or just the person doesn't know it's incorrect
Re:Open Source Farming Robot by nozzlegear on Sunday August 04, 2024 @12:56PM (#41154787)
I'm a native English speaker, and if I'd spoken what they said out loud then I would've said "there's" precisely because "there're" is more difficult to pronounce. It's also how I'd write it, even though I know "there is" is not correct; it's just an evolution of the language, like "ain't".
Re:Open Source Farming Robot by qingcharles on Sunday August 04, 2024 @02:41PM (#41155434)
It's a common way of speaking informal English.