> I don't make extraordinary claims
That seems like a pretty extraordinary claim to me. That you've made. Twice.
This shows such black-and-white thinking, thinking in absolutes that doesn't take in account, the context and circumstances.
To me it shows a rigid mind that can't perceive nuance, and think / reason about topics in a particular context.
Minor mistakes are often just that: minor mistakes. If this was an error in a scientific paper or news article, your stance may have had more merit. But that's not the context here at all.
> I don't make extraordinary claims so I am not bound to provide any extraordinary evidence. They do make an extraordinary claim.
A blog claiming not to track you isn't an 'extraordinary claim' by any definition. So that's a mistake on your part, so I can't take anything you say seriously anymore, by your own definition.
It does matter, it is important. Making such a mistake calls into question if they don't have other, more serious, mistakes in their actual articles.
> Next time you make a mistake, I hope people around you will treat you the same way you treat other people, let’s find out if you like that.
I don't make extraordinary claims so I am not bound to provide any extraordinary evidence. They do make an extraordinary claim.