louwrentius
This is a terrible way of communicating vulnerabilities.
I don’t care you are hosted in Zwitserland, your CEO makes me distrust the company dearly.
There is no alternative to Debian for me. I’m ready to justy throw out all my computers and become a goat herder at this point.
PS I’ll remove memory and storage from said computers to pay for land and goats before I chuck them out of my window.
Especially if its for the purpose to drum up interest for your autobiography.
In The Netherlands, we do have ANPR camera's but they are run by the police and there are strict rules about data retention (no hit on a licence plate means drop the data). ANPR cameras aren't used as dragnet surveillance. The NL situation is not perfect, but it's on a different playing field.
With the absolute unregulated situation in the USA, the outcome has been predictable: cops stalking people and innocent people jailed for weeks due to mistakes.
I love Benn Jordan's work, including the video where they went to a Flock office building, filming employees. They didn't like being filmed, but it did not teach them a lesson unfortunately.
If you (still) work for Flock, don't think of yourself as a moral, decent person.
No Hate in Homelab – know the record before HomelabFest
The history of Big Tech (it's darker that you think)
You are still anti-abortion (even after rape), anti-contraceptives and anti-homosexuality, right?
At no point did I talk about government intervention or something like that.
Just civilians being informed to make choices they want to make
I don't support people who advocate for policies that hurt and kill people (mostly women in this case). That cause tremendous suffering.
I can't support such people in any way, even if their personal politics have nothing to do with their work or whatever event they plan.
People can believe and support what they want, but they should not be free of consequences for such beliefs: exclusion and boycots.
I wouldn’t go if I could and I love homelabs. Your politics matter, especially now.
These 'serious' bugs aren't important if you've been working on this code base for years and only now they pop up. I suspect - although I'm guessing - that probably a hobby project.
Frankly speaking, although this comment is very dismissive about the opinion blog article - assertively stating that this isn't a well-thought-out post - it seems to me that the personal anekdote is irrelevant and that the blog post in question still fully stands.
That can't justify the 1+ trillion invested in AI, right?
> Money is the means by which we facilitate exchange. But in reality, the energy in the universe is ginormous. > Is AI bad for the environment or is it the way we obtain energy bad for the environment?
I find this dishonest, we know that it's running on natural gas mostly and it's thus contributing to climate change + harm for communities. There's no way around this.
The 2026 paper admitted it's different and has issues.
> A lot of software projects don't make money directly. Our company makes money.
That's an evasive answer and you know it. It's about AI making an impact on the bottom line, justifying it's cost.
> A lot of software projects don't make money directly. Our company makes money. This would have cost thousands of dollars paid to a contractor previously with unclear results so yes it's 100% justified.
Thousands of dollars is pocket change even for a small company. That's not the kind of impact AI is supposed to have. You see why I'm not convinced? You also don't talk about the unsubsidised cost of AI nor the negative externalities.
2. Does this warrant the unsubsidized cost of AI?
3. Does this justify the harmful externalities of AI?
I don't need personal anecdotes. I want evidence that organisations make more money, get more efficient (and so on) due to AI. Please cite a paper.