Re:Is a 'slow' swimming pool impeding world records?
by jimktrains2 on Thursday August 01, 2024 @10:36AM
(#41129531)
There's something to be said for racing _someone_ and not just the clock, for the swimmers/racers, not even thinking about the audience.
Additionally, it would make races take 8x to 10x amount of time.
Re:Is a 'slow' swimming pool impeding world records?
by eru on Thursday August 01, 2024 @09:30PM
(#41135353)
> There's something to be said for racing _someone_ and not just the clock, for the swimmers/racers, not even thinking about the audience.
Yes, it's more fun.
> Additionally, it would make races take 8x to 10x amount of time.
Well, that's not a problem, they can run different events in parallel. Eg swimming and running shouldn't interfere at all with each other.
Re:Is a 'slow' swimming pool impeding world records?
by jimktrains2 on Friday August 02, 2024 @09:58AM
(#41138848)
It's not just about the fun; having someone next to you can make you push a little harder.
They already run events in parallel.
In earlier times, measuring equipment wasn't accurate enough, so races had to be done in parallel with people starting at the same time. Today, that's no longer necessary. In fact, people racing one after another is exactly how we hand out world records.
Of course, the Olympics and other events like them aren't there to find the best athletes in some absolute sense; these events are there to entertain spectators. Otherwise, swimmers could just do time trials at home and mail in times.
And spectators like people racing each other at the same time.