Re:White House says no need to restrict 'open-source' AI at ...
by talldayo on Tuesday July 30, 2024 @01:18PM
(#41111684)
They don't? Microsoft and Google both promote Open Source inferencing frameworks, and while both also have proprietary products I think it's completely dishonest to say they "mainly" support them. ONNX and Tensorflow have been supported longer and more productively than any of the closed-source AI frameworks Google or Microsoft offer.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:White House says no need to restrict 'open-source' AI at ...
by rvnx on Tuesday July 30, 2024 @01:24PM
(#41111771)
Let’s see what the future holds.
I’m feeling that the next step will be for regulators to start restricting more and more open-source/open-weight LLMs (and their equivalent Diffusion models), in the name of safety.
Perhaps requiring certifications in professional use for example.
I see it as a happy coincidence for these large players if this is the case, because only folks with large pockets and the right thoughts will be able to get certified.
Re:White House says no need to restrict 'open-source' AI at ...
by talldayo on Tuesday July 30, 2024 @01:30PM
(#41111850)
You are currently posting in a thread where the root article is a press release detailing why open weight LLMs aren't going to get restricted by the incumbents. I also have seen no indication that any president-hopefuls intend to regulate the tech either. There are no demonstrated dangers yet, the value of exporting this digital snake-oil far outweighs the cost of other people asking ChatGPT how to make a fertilizer bomb.