Re:FTC Launches Probe into 'Surveillance Pricing'
by lelandfe on Saturday July 27, 2024 @03:20PM
(#41088682)
“I can’t replicate” does not disprove the behavior. Reddit blocks me from loading almost any post while logged out[0], faking that they’re NSFW. The person next to me does not have this “feature.”
I believe companies use feature flagging in this way (for years!) to avoid scrutiny of these dark patterns. You, of course, may also be right that it was coincidence.
Re:FTC Launches Probe into 'Surveillance Pricing'
by pedalpete on Saturday July 27, 2024 @09:47PM
(#41090690)
I was being sarcastic about "bleeding out" obviously, if it's that bad, you're not taking an Uber.
This was also about 7 years ago, no competitors (in Australia) and Uber has a history of this sort of behavior.
I just tried this and can't replicate. While it's possible that uber was preying on the fact you had an emergency, it's equally likely it was a coincidence. Moreover, "this guy is going to a hospital so let's charge him more because he's probably going to bleed out" is a pretty poor strategy. Besides the obvious PR risk, most people going to the hospital probably aren't bleeding out or in any sort of emergency. Think of the last time you were at a hospital. How many cars are in the parking lot vs waiting in the emergency room? It's far more likely that you're there for non-emergency reasons (eg. visiting a someone, going to an appointment, or work there), and charging 3x surge pricing is a good way of losing the fare to a competitor.