I agree with the laziness but Switzerland is not in the EU so not really relevant.

Poster above you (in my hnreader) points out Seattle is pretty ad free, so maybe its not just a Swiss (noted as 'not in EU') thing. If 'lazy policy-making' improves quality of life, why would you be so against it? Especially in Switzerland, where voting isn't so much about screaming headlines, but more about maintaining/ improving said qol.

Not EU, and a direct democracy

Switzerland isn't in the EU.

And no, banning things isn't 'lazy', its 'committed'.

Markets are often the right solution, but in many case its not about manipulating marginal prices, its about making a clear statement.

Our towns will be better, our collective living standard will go up without ads. There is not clear way how we can get a market to arbitrate this.

> "Nudge" by Richard Thaler.

That book is way, way over-rated and also just completely wrong and informed at times. Even the best example of 'Nudge' about opt-out organ donor barley hold up in the real world.

This podcast about the book is pretty good:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UjArvN9cfgE

There is a Part 2 that goes into 'Nudge' being used by governments around the world.

You can find the show-notes with lots of sources they used here:

https://old.reddit.com/r/IfBooksCouldKill/comments/137g83j/i...

Yeah we should definitely let amoral and psychologically manipulative business practices be handled by the magical market! After all, it's worked so great so far in all the places without a billboard/advertising ban where you definitely don't see an ad on every single public surface where an eyeball might eventually land.

Let's also let companies dump toxic waste into our drinking water, the "market" will surely make sure to reward only the good, clean companies.

This was the result of Swiss direct democracy within the small town in question - essentially, an idea from citizens, voted on by citizens within the relevant area.

So actually more "free" than most countries can even imagine.

Not that I agree with GP but there is a lot more to freedom than "the decision was made by a vote". Of course there are plenty of countries which can't seem to get any aspect of freedom down so your comparison still holds true regardless.