News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Every company should be owned by its employees by talldatethrow on Thursday July 25, 2024 @02:43AM (#41065432)
People can absolutely afford houses. They can so easily afford houses that they buy them quickly, often for over asking.

If people couldn't afford houses, they would sit unsold until sellers lowered the price to a price someone could afford. Luckily so many people can afford houses in most areas they don't have to do that.

Re:Every company should be owned by its employees by sofixa on Thursday July 25, 2024 @02:46AM (#41065452)
You're confusing some entities, often private equity or similar corporations buying assets, often to rent, sometimes just to park, being able to buy, and the general public being able to afford to buy. In many desirable metro areas, you need two high incomes (two people in tech or lawyers or finance) to be able to afford to buy anything. What about everyone else?
Re:Every company should be owned by its employees by throwaway4pp24 on Thursday July 25, 2024 @02:51AM (#41065487)
Why does everyone else need to live in a desirable metro area? That sounds infeasible with so few of them. If there was more desirable metro areas, the prices of those few wouldn't be so high.
Re:Every company should be owned by its employees by timschmidt on Thursday July 25, 2024 @03:04AM (#41065586)
> Why does everyone else need to live in a desirable metro area?

Jobs, mostly. Along with increased access to all the things people like, like food, other people, activities, etc.

Re:Every company should be owned by its employees by sofixa on Thursday July 25, 2024 @05:54AM (#41066751)
> Why does everyone else need to live in a desirable metro area

Because if nothing else (and there is a lot of else) the tech/lawyer/finance folks want to have restaurants, shops, cinemas, street cleaners, utilities etc etc etc etc

Re:Every company should be owned by its employees by blackhawkC17 on Thursday July 25, 2024 @01:14PM (#41071034)
Then they should be ready to pay higher rents for it, because everyone else also wants the same thing.
Re:Every company should be owned by its employees by ffgjgf1 on Thursday July 25, 2024 @03:00AM (#41065557)
> often private equity or similar corporations buying assets

What proportion of housing do they own? I would assume it’s pretty small if still significant.

Re:Every company should be owned by its employees by mjamesaustin on Thursday July 25, 2024 @03:16AM (#41065681)
Huge percentage nowadays. Lately private equity is making 30-40% of all single family home purchases in the US.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/mar/15/in-shift-44...

Re:Every company should be owned by its employees by makeitshine on Thursday July 25, 2024 @02:53AM (#41065504)
It has become out of reach for an increasing number of people all around the world. Look at the ratios of price to annual salaries and many have risen a lot.

US: https://www.jchs.harvard.edu/blog/home-price-income-ratio-re...

> If people couldn't afford houses, they would sit unsold until sellers lowered the price to a price someone could afford.

This is fundamentally not the case in much of China and Taiwan where the wealthy sit on empty homes for years or decades. The housing price in Taipei continues to climb while a large number of units sit vacant.

Re:Every company should be owned by its employees by superb_dev on Thursday July 25, 2024 @02:49AM (#41065478)
Some people, and a lot of private investment.
Re:Every company should be owned by its employees by talldatethrow on Thursday July 25, 2024 @11:29AM (#41069833)
Apparently there are more people with money than there are houses. So don't tell me people cant afford houses. Tell me that there are so few houses that they are overpriced or something, and only the top 25% can buy them.