> I think you dramatically overestimate the number of people that would actually care about any theoretical privacy infringement
Not really surprised that you don't see it as a problem
> This is a very antiquated view IMO. You are already being filmed and monitored at work.
Not really surprised that you don't see it as a problem
> a privacy-aware secure LLM
Funniest thing I've heard all month.
> And if facial recognition becomes that common for wearers, most of the population is going to adorn something to prevent that.
In my opinion, you do not have an accurate view of how much the average person cares about this. London is the most surveilled city on the planet with widespread CCTV/facial recognition, as is Washington D.C. and China. But literally no one bothers with anti-surveillance measures.
> I’m not working there and I have to think many would agree. Coworkers don’t and wouldn’t tolerate coworkers taking videos or pictures of them.
This is a very antiquated view IMO. You are already being filmed and monitored at work. I see no issue with a local LLM interpreting my environment, or even a privacy-aware secure LLM deployment like Apple's Private Cloud Compute: https://security.apple.com/blog/private-cloud-compute/