Re:Ask HN: Any CI/CD SaaS Solutions for ARM?
by pwmtr on Monday July 22, 2024 @02:36PM
(#41038025)
At Ubicloud, we have ARM64 runners. They are compatible with Github Runners. It is just one line change in your workflow file. It is also 6x more cost effective than Github Runners (btw. our x64 runners are 10x more cost effective)
Re:Ask HN: Any CI/CD SaaS Solutions for ARM?
by pwmtr on Wednesday July 24, 2024 @05:47PM
(#41062522)
Our runners are running on our own infrastructure. We get bare metal instances from providers like Hetzner or Leaseweb and virtualize them. Your runners run on the ephemeral VMs on those bare metal instances.
Re:Ask HN: Any CI/CD SaaS Solutions for ARM?
by vednig on Monday July 22, 2024 @02:01PM
(#41037428)
Yeah, unfortunately there are only large runners avilable for arm64. I have medium to low workload for building.
Additionally, they are only available on paid plans.
Re:Ask HN: Any CI/CD SaaS Solutions for ARM?
by vednig on Monday July 22, 2024 @02:16PM
(#41037690)
Cause, I recently encountered problem with Azure's Network in Virginia and Arizona so I would prefer any other stack.
Spent hours debugging only to be known that it's beyond my control. :)
More informative can be found here https://www.ubicloud.com/use-cases/github-actions
and here https://www.ubicloud.com/docs/github-actions-integration/qui...
Is being on AWS a requirement for you? Is it because of caching? We also have our own runner cache. You can find more information from here https://www.ubicloud.com/docs/github-actions-integration/ubi...
If you have more questions, please let me know or alternatively you can send us a mail from [email protected]
We provide fast compute for various architectures and OSes.
Must be installed in your AWS account (1-click cloudformation template), and then you can use any instance type offered by AWS.