> but i did not ask you to take further steps in the same direction, so that you could twist my words.

I took them to paint an example, so that my argument could be better understood. The example was clearly presented as my own; I have twisted no words of yours from what I can see, and I most certainly wasn't trying to.

> i limited myself to C and closely related topics […]

Yes, while the submission is about Aro, not C, hence the disagreement.

> […] so i will not engage further with you.

Thank you, I suppose.