This isn’t true in general and depends on the local economy and the immigrants country of origin. MENA migrants are a net loss for Germany, for example.
Even if economists agree, the money these immigrants spend lands in the pockets of rich capitalists.
The entire topic is far more nuanced than you make it out to be.
[1]: https://www.handelsblatt.com/politik/deutschland/demografie-...
Yeah lets just turn America into Mexico, no big deal. What's the worst that can happen? Let's make the national average IQ 87 and turn ourselves into a shithole so we can have people to do menial jobs for slave wages.
Is this some propaganda website by Bush to promote neocon values?
This can only be true if they sustain themselves on their own work. An immigrant that does not work and only lives on subsidies can hardly be called a net positive.
Health insurance companies, for example, are a negative drain on society, yet they employ hundreds of thousands of workers, in what can only be explained as a make-work program for pointless bureaucracy.
Lots of this in the DOD as well. And the homeless program administrators, which you mentioned.
It's just not explicit welfare to the poorest of the poor and there are a few implicit steps, because otherwise it looks bad.
https://web.archive.org/web/20240111003833/https://www.econo...
In countries like the US that are good at integrating immigrants, they are a huge net positive.
https://www.bushcenter.org/catalyst/north-american-century/b...