Python-3.13 is more than 100% slower with –disable-gil

Re:Python-3.13 is more than 100% slower with –disable-gil by lakrman on Saturday July 20, 2024 @05:24PM (#41020067)

No, with sum moved into the function I get 6s for --enable-gil and 15.5s for --disable-gil on my machine, which is in the same order.

As an added bonus, the stock Debian Python 3.7 is faster than both versions.

So the alleged "faster python" promises are not kept, and neither are the "at most 15% slowdown" promises for the no-gil project.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Python-3.13 is more than 100% slower with –disable-gil by rbanffy on Saturday July 20, 2024 @07:56PM (#41021239)

Would be worthwhile to run something more significant, maybe pybench.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Python-3.13 is more than 100% slower with –disable-gil by HAKSH on Saturday July 20, 2024 @08:01PM (#41021273)

This benchmark shows abysmal numbers, no need to run a bloated test suite that is so large and convoluted that no one understands what is being measured.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Python-3.13 is more than 100% slower with –disable-gil by rbanffy on Sunday July 21, 2024 @08:54AM (#41024745)

A test that shows a worst possible scenario is not a benchmark, not an accurate reflection of what users will experience.

[ Parent | on HN ]