Re:Police warn of thieves using WiFi-jamming tech to disarm ...
by Gys on Thursday July 18, 2024 @07:42PM
(#41000788)
Reolink outside camera’s are too cheaply build. I have several and most have been replaced within a year. I am looking for alternatives that are built better.
Re:Police warn of thieves using WiFi-jamming tech to disarm ...
by amy-petrik-214 on Thursday July 18, 2024 @09:49PM
(#41001451)
I attest to reolink, have used it for security, 16 cameras, 3000 miles away, for ~2-3 years. Setup includes UPS on everything. Has been very stable. It even has a pretty easy to reverse engineer cgi-bin API (and very insecure) but sadly my ISP plugged the firewall hole I made for that :(
I have in some cameras had issues with connectivity but as far as I can tell, it's from using an indoor ethernet cable outside... and the RJ-45 end-of-cable wire threads literally dissolve into dust from the moisture... but that's not on the camera
Re:Police warn of thieves using WiFi-jamming tech to disarm ...
by egberts1 on Thursday July 18, 2024 @06:57PM
(#41000522)
Reolink periodically phones home ... to China.
Re:Police warn of thieves using WiFi-jamming tech to disarm ...
by para_parolu on Thursday July 18, 2024 @07:35PM
(#41000757)
Anything will phone home eventually if connected to internet. Home cameras should not be connected to internet regardless if they use wifi or wire.
Unifi Protect is my go-to because of usability but does (somewhat) rely on their SSO cloud login. All stored locally though on purchased NVRs and their app is soooo much better than Reolink's.