News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by addi... by lilyball on Tuesday July 16, 2024 @07:32PM (#40981305)
Perhaps the emails have both html and plain text representations, and you've configured your client to only show the plain text version?
Re:Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by addi... by theamk on Tuesday July 16, 2024 @08:04PM (#40981434)
you almost got it!

This was likely winmail.dat/TNEF[0], Microsoft's proprietary replacement of HTML.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Neutral_Encapsulatio...

Re:Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by addi... by adzm on Tuesday July 16, 2024 @09:31PM (#40981854)
TNEF is a container/encapsulation format rather than a markup language. It can contain HTML as well as RTF and plain text.

Granted HTML rendering of email is full of quirks in Outlook

Re:Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by addi... by throwaway3306a on Wednesday July 17, 2024 @01:50AM (#40982962)
It's using Word to render html. They tried using a browser engine but then it rendered a copy-pasted Word text differently and users hated that.
Re:Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by addi... by unnah on Wednesday July 17, 2024 @02:50AM (#40983204)
Now that they are transitioning the desktop version of Outlook into an Electron-like webview, I suppose showing HTML directly in the webview is out of the question, and they must be using the Javascript version of Word to render HTML...
Re:Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by addi... by pjmlp on Wednesday July 17, 2024 @07:00AM (#40984571)
And everyone on Microsoft ecosystem hates the new Outlook version.

We already have the 365 Web version for that.

Yet another example of Microsoft's failure to hire employees with native Windows development skills, now with the old guard that grew up with Win32 are reaching retirement age.

Re:Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by addi... by marcosdumay on Wednesday July 17, 2024 @11:59AM (#40987315)
If you ever though nobody had an use-case for WASM...