Re:AT&T Paid a Hacker $370k to Delete Stolen Phone Records
by ranger_danger on Monday July 15, 2024 @10:51PM
(#40973327)
The message I'm getting though ("Please complete the security check to access archive.ph") is from CF, and I do not use their DNS or anyone who does.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:AT&T Paid a Hacker $370k to Delete Stolen Phone Records
by Arnavion on Tuesday July 16, 2024 @12:18PM
(#40977909)
Read the comment carefully.
>The message I'm getting though ("Please complete the security check to access archive.ph") is from CF
That is what I said.
>and I do not use their DNS or anyone who does.
That is not what I said.
Re:AT&T Paid a Hacker $370k to Delete Stolen Phone Records
by ranger_danger on Tuesday July 16, 2024 @12:25PM
(#40977965)
> is from CF
> That is what I said
No, you said:
> archive.today (and its sister sites like .ph) don't use CloudFlare,
Re:AT&T Paid a Hacker $370k to Delete Stolen Phone Records
by Arnavion on Tuesday July 16, 2024 @01:09PM
(#40978329)
Well done on reading that far. Now do me the favor of reading past that.
Re:AT&T Paid a Hacker $370k to Delete Stolen Phone Records
by ranger_danger on Tuesday July 16, 2024 @01:27PM
(#40978481)
I think one could argue that your supposed sinkhole is still "using CF". I still don't agree with your response "that's what I said", and I think you don't really know what they're using anyways so this is a pointless argument IMO.
Either way that's no excuse for the attitude. Please try to think about how your words come across to others and whether you would want to be treated the same way, especially when it is something trivial like a disagreement on terminology.