Re:Women who make Samsung semiconductors are striking
by hammock on Monday July 15, 2024 @03:05PM
(#40970568)
That graph is US only
Re:Women who make Samsung semiconductors are striking
by vivekd on Monday July 15, 2024 @03:47PM
(#40970901)
Good point - the graph being US only means it misses offshoring manufacturing jobs to places like China. We can't assume that the loss of manufacturing jobs was solely caused by automation
Re:Women who make Samsung semiconductors are striking
by eru on Monday July 15, 2024 @10:01PM
(#40973118)
Why call it 'loss', if it was outsourced? UnAmericans are also human.
Re:Women who make Samsung semiconductors are striking
by trealira on Monday July 15, 2024 @10:11PM
(#40973159)
Why do you think the word "loss" implies they think non-Americans aren't human?
Re:Women who make Samsung semiconductors are striking
by justinclift on Tuesday July 16, 2024 @09:02AM
(#40976142)
Pretty sure the point was that the jobs are just being moved around, not "lost".
Re:Women who make Samsung semiconductors are striking
by eru on Wednesday July 17, 2024 @01:02AM
(#40982723)
I was specifically interested in the contrast to automation alluded to in https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40970901
A job can be truly 'lost' if it's replaced by a machine. But it's merely reshuffled, if a foreigner does it.
Re:Women who make Samsung semiconductors are striking
by TOMDM on Monday July 15, 2024 @10:28PM
(#40973226)
Where else would you apply this reasoning?
If I lose my phone it doesn't stop being a phone...
Number of people producing goods has been shrinking for a longest time, its under 20% now. It'll likely keep shrinking as automation becomes more advanced, and in the future "service" would be much more important.
When I was a kid, I've read some sci-fi stories about societies like those, where most people were working in service industry.
[0] https://www.advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/2023/09/0...