We need visual programming. No, not like that

Re:We need visual programming. No, not like that by frou_dh on Monday July 15, 2024 @04:19AM (#40966095)

Much like designing Integrated Circuit chips, vs. only doing basic breadboard-ing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We need visual programming. No, not like that by jampekka on Monday July 15, 2024 @06:39AM (#40966658)

The spatial (usually largely 2D in IC) constraints are a huge limitation for circuit design. I'm quite sure chips (or breadboards) wouldn't be designed like this if the physical world wouldn't force the geometry.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We need visual programming. No, not like that by frou_dh on Monday July 15, 2024 @06:50AM (#40966704)

I meant more that the very concept of an IC is a good idea, and like a good abstraction in programming.

I think pjmlp was getting at is that when using visual programming, a lot of people seem to turn off (or not cultivate) the part of the thought process concerned with creating good abstractions, despite it at least being possible to do so.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We need visual programming. No, not like that by pjmlp on Monday July 15, 2024 @09:07AM (#40967551)

Exactly, packaging transitors into IC Modules, so to speak.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We need visual programming. No, not like that by pjmlp on Monday July 15, 2024 @05:19AM (#40966345)

Yes, very much so.

[ Parent | on HN ]