Re:Dear AWS, please let me be a cloud engineer again
by shell_game on Saturday July 13, 2024 @07:44PM
(#40957755)
Here here. Couldn’t have described AWS better.
Re:Dear AWS, please let me be a cloud engineer again
by Aeolun on Saturday July 13, 2024 @09:07PM
(#40958123)
> AWS is organizationally incapable of launching a non-infrastructure product that is simply great
I’d argue that nothing AWS launches is great at launch. The good products we actually use have all been around for 10+ years.
Re:Dear AWS, please let me be a cloud engineer again
by AtlasBarfed on Saturday July 13, 2024 @09:29PM
(#40958202)
Like the aws console?
The problem is, for all it's talk over the last few years, AWS remains a complete non-player in the GenAI space, much less so than Azure. In my opinion the problem is exactly the same as for every other high-level service they've tried to launch. QuickSight, Lex, Polly, Cognito, CodeGuru, SageMaker, etc: they're not good. Nobody ever said "I really like QuickSight, I sure wish it had GenAI capabilities". So when the hastily-expanded QuickSight team(s) then goes on to release 42 different Q enabled SKUs, nobody cares. For various reasons, AWS is organizationally incapable of launching a non-infrastructure product that is simply great, as doing so would take attention to detail and deeply caring about things like UX which are anathema to Amazon.
On the positive side, GenAI model access will be commoditized and part of the basic undifferentiated cloud infra, and AWS will do fine there.