Re:Free-threaded CPython is ready to experiment with
by stavros on Friday July 12, 2024 @09:05PM
(#40950915)
If I had a penny for every time I gave up on compiling C++ software because there's no way to know what dependencies it needs, I'd be a millionaire. Python at least lists them.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Free-threaded CPython is ready to experiment with
by dgfitz on Friday July 12, 2024 @09:35PM
(#40951071)
If I had a penny every time I heard something like that on sites like this, I’d be a billionaire :)
Re:Free-threaded CPython is ready to experiment with
by ahartmetz on Saturday July 13, 2024 @04:40AM
(#40952677)
Is that because the compiler failed with "foo.h not found" or the build system said "libfoo not found"? CMake is most common and it will tell you. Worst case it's difficult to derive the package name from the name in the diagnostic.
It's not great, but usually not a big deal neither IME. Typically a couple of minutes to e.g. find that required libSDL2 addon module or whatever, if there is that kind of problem at all.
Re:Free-threaded CPython is ready to experiment with
by stavros on Saturday July 13, 2024 @05:53AM
(#40952957)
Yes it is, and it's usually such a big deal for me that I just don't use that software. I don't have time to go through a loop of "what's the file name? What package is it in? Install, repeat". This is by far the worst experience I've had with any language. Python has been a breeze in comparison.
Re:Free-threaded CPython is ready to experiment with
by dgfitz on Saturday July 13, 2024 @09:07AM
(#40953902)
I’m not going to refute your points. If you’re going to wear rose-tinted glasses about all of the bad parts about python, that’s fine, I also like python.