Re:Europe's new Ariane 6 rocket powers into space
by protomolecule on Wednesday July 10, 2024 @08:40AM
(#40926240)
SpaceX wasn't the first American rocket startup, other ones failed. What makes you think European startups won't fail?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Europe's new Ariane 6 rocket powers into space
by cubefox on Wednesday July 10, 2024 @09:40AM
(#40926797)
I suggested funding multiple ones.
Re:Europe's new Ariane 6 rocket powers into space
by protomolecule on Thursday July 11, 2024 @07:47AM
(#40935632)
China has multiple rocket startups now, they are not too successful.
Re:Europe's new Ariane 6 rocket powers into space
by echoangle on Thursday July 11, 2024 @10:13AM
(#40937050)
Galactic energy has had 13/14 successful launches, how is that not successful?
Re:Europe's new Ariane 6 rocket powers into space
by protomolecule on Thursday July 11, 2024 @03:19PM
(#40939693)
Those are launches of small rocket flying on toxic hydrazine and capable of getting whopping 300 kg of payload into LEO. [0]
Re:Europe's new Ariane 6 rocket powers into space
by echoangle on Thursday July 11, 2024 @07:10PM
(#40941421)
Ok? Aren’t you shifting goalposts now? Is rocket lab also not successful, because they only have 300 kg payload, too? And how does the toxicity of the fuel matter?
Re:Europe's new Ariane 6 rocket powers into space
by protomolecule on Friday July 12, 2024 @02:36AM
(#40943172)
>Aren’t you shifting goalposts now?
No, but mentioning successful launches of a small disposable rocket in the context of conversation about replicating reusable Falcon-9 is shifting goalposts. Galactic energy, that you named, is only trying to develop its Pallas-1 rocket that resembles Falcon-9.
>how does the toxicity of the fuel matter
It's the technology of the previous century when the need to achieve strategic goals out-weighted a lot of safety concerns.