News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Europe's new Ariane 6 rocket powers into space by protomolecule on Wednesday July 10, 2024 @08:40AM (#40926240)
SpaceX wasn't the first American rocket startup, other ones failed. What makes you think European startups won't fail?
Re:Europe's new Ariane 6 rocket powers into space by cubefox on Wednesday July 10, 2024 @09:40AM (#40926797)
I suggested funding multiple ones.
Re:Europe's new Ariane 6 rocket powers into space by protomolecule on Thursday July 11, 2024 @07:47AM (#40935632)
China has multiple rocket startups now, they are not too successful.
Re:Europe's new Ariane 6 rocket powers into space by echoangle on Thursday July 11, 2024 @10:13AM (#40937050)
Galactic energy has had 13/14 successful launches, how is that not successful?
Re:Europe's new Ariane 6 rocket powers into space by protomolecule on Thursday July 11, 2024 @03:19PM (#40939693)
Those are launches of small rocket flying on toxic hydrazine and capable of getting whopping 300 kg of payload into LEO. [0]

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galactic_Energy#Ceres-1

Re:Europe's new Ariane 6 rocket powers into space by echoangle on Thursday July 11, 2024 @07:10PM (#40941421)
Ok? Aren’t you shifting goalposts now? Is rocket lab also not successful, because they only have 300 kg payload, too? And how does the toxicity of the fuel matter?
Re:Europe's new Ariane 6 rocket powers into space by protomolecule on Friday July 12, 2024 @02:36AM (#40943172)
>Aren’t you shifting goalposts now?

No, but mentioning successful launches of a small disposable rocket in the context of conversation about replicating reusable Falcon-9 is shifting goalposts. Galactic energy, that you named, is only trying to develop its Pallas-1 rocket that resembles Falcon-9.

>how does the toxicity of the fuel matter

It's the technology of the previous century when the need to achieve strategic goals out-weighted a lot of safety concerns.