Re:The zombie misconception of theoretical computer science
by zeroonetwothree on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @10:35AM
(#40916628)
Computable has a standard definition in CS. It’s not like the author made it up or something.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The zombie misconception of theoretical computer science
by jvanderbot on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @11:18AM
(#40917107)
Yeah, if you're talking to CS folks who have encountered that definition as part of a theory class, then sure, good chances they could be scolded for asking the wrong questions using that word.
But that's a small bit of CS undergrads, and a very small part of the internet / wider world, who have a more colloquial definition of it. Not sure it's entirely worth scolding them, is all I'm saying.
Re:The zombie misconception of theoretical computer science
by umanwizard on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @11:35AM
(#40917329)
The post is on a theoretical CS blog, talking about a question in a theoretical CS textbook. Why shouldn’t we expect it to use theoretical CS jargon?