Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for official acts

Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic... by stephenr on Monday July 01, 2024 @10:06PM (#40852906)

I have no specific knowledge of the case you're referring to. I'll just assume it happened as you say it did.

Why are you upset that people are concerned by a ruling allowing exactly what you're concerned about? Shouldn't you be upset that neither the DOJ nor Congress took action against the President in question?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic... by treeFall on Tuesday July 02, 2024 @04:03AM (#40854510)

It doesn't allow it, because it already happens. People are acting like this is enabling some new behavior, and that the sky is falling, but this behavior has already been established.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic... by nielsbot on Wednesday July 03, 2024 @12:43AM (#40862773)

Then the ruling is unnecessary, right?

[ Parent | on HN ]