Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic...
by austin-cheney on Monday July 01, 2024 @09:04PM
(#40852593)
Yes, he has said all kinds of nonsense that had no means to ever materialize. For example I don’t see Mexico paying for a border wall.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic...
by BadHumans on Monday July 01, 2024 @09:32PM
(#40852734)
By reclassifying all these individuals as Schedule F, he actually has the means to do this and it is a key part of Project 2025. During his first term, he enacted Schedule F and it was repealed by the Biden admin. Trump intends on reintroducing it in a second term. So he has the means to make this one re-materialize and this time he'll actually have the staff to replace people with.
Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic...
by laidoffamazon on Monday July 01, 2024 @09:29PM
(#40852716)
“Attempted murder. Now honestly what is that? Can you win a Nobel Prize for attempted chemistry?”
It's fundamentally dishonest - and also somewhat delusional - to discount threats even if they didn't come to pass one time. People doubted Trump would try to hold onto office, until he did.
Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic...
by austin-cheney on Monday July 01, 2024 @09:50PM
(#40852823)
I don’t doubt Trump will try to do the nonsense he says. I do doubt he has the means to persuade educated persons to do such things.
Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic...
by laidoffamazon on Monday July 01, 2024 @10:17PM
(#40852956)
Again, this is less of a concern for him now that he will have sycophants in his orbit now that he's run out of people that will say no to him.
As an aside, I also have doubts that a chimpanzee would be able to successfully disable the safety an AK47. But it would be idiotic to leave that to chance and give one a loaded AK47 anyway.