Which raises the question of why they thought they'd approve this bill in committee? It's till very odd, weird, ungentlemanly and somewhat uncivilized.

Funnily almost none of the adjectives here fits what's described.

To follow the analogy, the reason they did it is because the "DEI outrage machine" needs fuel, and this was the next low-hanging fruit. To the machine, women aren't as important as perpetuating itself, so hence we now are starting to get women drafted into traditionally (and oddly, actually gender appropriate) male-roles that are actually dangerous.

> now are starting to get women drafted

We haven't even drafted men in fifty years.