News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Japan Wants To Build A 311-Mile Cargo Conveyor Belt due a... by numpad0 on Monday July 01, 2024 @08:12PM (#40852248)
The famous Japanese rail network is incompatible with the ISO 40/20ft container spec. Surprise surprise...
Re:Japan Wants To Build A 311-Mile Cargo Conveyor Belt due a... by AlbertCory on Monday July 01, 2024 @08:31PM (#40852371)
that's what I was wondering, too. How is it incompatible? Wrong gauges?
Re:Japan Wants To Build A 311-Mile Cargo Conveyor Belt due a... by numpad0 on Monday July 01, 2024 @09:24PM (#40852680)
It's combination of tunnel ceiling height, weight limit, and chassis mounting compatibility. I'm not completely sure there were protectionism of either directions are involved with JNR/JR 12/20/31ft system and ISO 20/40ft, both seem to have been conceived around the same time in mid 60s.
Re:Japan Wants To Build A 311-Mile Cargo Conveyor Belt due a... by corey_moncure on Monday July 01, 2024 @08:35PM (#40852400)
JR (on which freight trains do run) network is 3/4 gauge, but JR shinkansen and other operators use standard.
Re:Japan Wants To Build A 311-Mile Cargo Conveyor Belt due a... by shiroiushi on Monday July 01, 2024 @08:56PM (#40852534)
>but JR shinkansen and other operators use standard.

That's irrelevant. The shinkansen tracks cannot be used for cargo trains: they're exclusively for high-speed passenger trains.

You can't share tracks between slow cargo trains and high-speed passenger trains. Not only is the scheduling impossible, but the cargo trains would ruin the tracks. The shinkansen tracks require frequent and thorough maintenance to keep them at the level needed for reliable high-speed service.

If you want to see what happens when you try to share tracks between cargo and passengers, just take a look at Amtrak. It's a complete disaster.