News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for official acts. Parent comment

Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic... by danielmarkbruce on Monday July 01, 2024 @07:25PM (#40851913)
The constitution says very little. Most legislation says very little. I don't think they are grabbing for power, they are just stating the obvious - this isn't covered, so I guess we'll cover it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic... by sangnoir on Monday July 01, 2024 @08:10PM (#40852236)
So the prior textualism was just tactical?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic... by danielmarkbruce on Wednesday July 03, 2024 @03:40PM (#40869326)
Textualism doesn't mean they say "i don't know, the answer to this very specific question isn't insanely obvious from reading the text".
[ Parent | on HN ]