News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic... by sowut on Monday July 01, 2024 @03:53PM (#40849898)
I can't reply to your last comment since it's nested so deep: "Help me understand how you read "courts may not inquire into the President’s motives", then. That's a ruling, by the Supreme Court, that they can not do so in this specific case."

There's scopes to the application of the ruling. An extrajudicial killing of a political opponent certainly falls outside of scope.

Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic... by ceejayoz on Monday July 01, 2024 @03:57PM (#40849949)
> An extrajudicial killing of a political opponent certainly falls outside of scope.

There wasn't all that much fuss when we did it to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anwar_al-Awlaki.

Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic... by sowut on Monday July 01, 2024 @05:08PM (#40850707)
while i appreciate he was a US citizen, i fail to see how it applies to our conversation
Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic... by ceejayoz on Monday July 01, 2024 @05:33PM (#40850971)
What legal theory makes this offing of a US citizen extrajudicially on national security grounds different?
Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic... by sowut on Tuesday July 02, 2024 @11:58AM (#40857910)
this is an extreme example that really needs no explanation