Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic...
by FuriouslyAdrift on Monday July 01, 2024 @03:37PM
(#40849716)
Then that would be a violation of the Presidential Records Act (1981) and they could be prosecuted.
Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic...
by vel0city on Monday July 01, 2024 @04:16PM
(#40850172)
They could just argue the PRA is impeding their ability to communicate with the people within the executive branch and are thus immune to the punishments of the PRA.
Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic...
by metabagel on Monday July 01, 2024 @05:00PM
(#40850625)
You missed the part where the Supreme Court granted the president immunity.
Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic...
by abduhl on Monday July 01, 2024 @03:22PM
(#40849526)
idk man, probably the same way that they get mafia bosses who write their plans on little pieces of paper that are given to henchmen who then burn them
I understand your point and I'm not saying it's a great spot to land at, but I don't understand how the country's President can function if it were any other way. It's not just about Donald Trump, it's about 1 through 44 and 46 through whatever number we get to before this whole place burns down.
It's the same things cops do, jeez.