News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic... by psunavy03 on Monday July 01, 2024 @02:31PM (#40848828)
> Armed forces killing people is a state of war.

Real life is rarely this black and white.

Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic... by clob on Monday July 01, 2024 @02:41PM (#40848939)
Which is why we invented laws and legal systems to codify such things.

Did you commit a crime, yes/no? Let's bring it to trial.

The circumstances are messy in all real world instances, but the outcome is binary.

Refusing to even put a president on trial is more black and white, because it's a clear "no, not illegal" without even discussion.

Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic... by davidmurdoch on Monday July 01, 2024 @04:59PM (#40850607)
Courts don't even decide yes/no. Maybe is an outcome. We don't know is also an outcome.
Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic... by grotorea on Monday July 01, 2024 @03:09PM (#40849342)
Doubly so since almost everyone stopped bothering to declare war after WW2.