Supreme Court guts agency power in seismic Chevron ruling

Re:Supreme Court guts agency power in seismic Chevron ruling by twoodfin on Friday June 28, 2024 @01:35PM (#40822929)

What does “expertise” have to do with whether Congress authorized fishermen to be charged for government-mandated inspectors?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Supreme Court guts agency power in seismic Chevron ruling by ceejayoz on Friday June 28, 2024 @01:53PM (#40823103)

Congress was pretty explicit about that; they wrote it in the legislation.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/50/679.55

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Supreme Court guts agency power in seismic Chevron ruling by massysett on Friday June 28, 2024 @02:06PM (#40823265)

You're citing an Executive-branch regulation, not a law from Congress.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Supreme Court guts agency power in seismic Chevron ruling by ceejayoz on Friday June 28, 2024 @03:52PM (#40824568)

My bad.

The regulation stems from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnuson%E2%80%93Stevens_Fishe..., which says things like:

> United States observers required under subsection (h) be permitted to be stationed aboard any such vessel and that all of the costs incurred incident to such sta- tioning, including the costs of data editing and entry and observer monitoring, be paid for, in accordance with such subsection, by the owner or operator of the vessel

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Supreme Court guts agency power in seismic Chevron ruling by curiousllama on Friday June 28, 2024 @02:12PM (#40823333)

The court made their decision at a very high level of abstraction, rather than limiting it to fishermen.

[ Parent | on HN ]