News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Supreme Court blocks Purdue Pharma opioid settlement by cogman10 on Thursday June 27, 2024 @10:47AM (#40811095)
Positive outcome. They earned hundreds of billions from their actions which resulted in the deaths of thousands.

Giving them permanent immunity was insane.

Re:Supreme Court blocks Purdue Pharma opioid settlement by HWR_14 on Thursday June 27, 2024 @11:21AM (#40811519)
> resulted in the deaths of thousands.

The number the Supreme Court used in its decision was 247,000 deaths over a twenty year period. That's the verified number and therefore almost certainly lower than reality.

Re:Supreme Court blocks Purdue Pharma opioid settlement by SoftTalker on Thursday June 27, 2024 @10:53AM (#40811172)
It also makes sense to me. If someone didn't join the class action, they should not be bound by its settlement, and should be free to pursue damage claims on their own.
Re:Supreme Court blocks Purdue Pharma opioid settlement by ericmcer on Thursday June 27, 2024 @11:36AM (#40811630)
deaths of thousands is a massive understatement. Just overdose deaths is probably getting close to a million. But they are also responsible for:

The people who don't OD but have their lives destroyed by opiods.

The family and friends who suffer because someone they know is an addict.

The time, money and energy society has spent trying to help addicts.

All the crimes, victims of crime and criminal justice costs that are a result of addiction.

They didn't kill thousands of people, they killed millions, affected every single person in the country negatively and contributed to the destabilization of our society.

Re:Supreme Court blocks Purdue Pharma opioid settlement by ben7799 on Thursday June 27, 2024 @10:49AM (#40811123)
Definitely a positive income. These people bear some of the responsibility for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people.

There is no way they should ever be immune from further punishments and get to live out the rest of their lives as billionaires.

Re:Supreme Court blocks Purdue Pharma opioid settlement by delichon on Thursday June 27, 2024 @10:58AM (#40811240)
Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor dissented.
Re:Supreme Court blocks Purdue Pharma opioid settlement by panda-giddiness on Thursday June 27, 2024 @11:03AM (#40811309)
Not quite. From the NY Times:

> In a 5-to-4 decision, written by Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, a majority of the justices held that the federal bankruptcy code does not authorize a liability shield for third parties in bankruptcy agreements. Justice Gorsuch was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel A. Alito Jr., Amy Coney Barrett and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Re:Supreme Court blocks Purdue Pharma opioid settlement by delichon on Thursday June 27, 2024 @11:07AM (#40811361)
My lineup was extracted from an AP story. Which is correct?

https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-purdue-pharma-opioi...

Re:Supreme Court blocks Purdue Pharma opioid settlement by jcranmer on Thursday June 27, 2024 @11:16AM (#40811478)
The decision itself:

> GORSUCH, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which THOMAS, ALITO, BARRETT, and JACKSON, JJ., joined. KAVANAUGH, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which ROBERTS, C. J., and SOTOMAYOR and KAGAN, JJ., joined.

Re:Supreme Court blocks Purdue Pharma opioid settlement by mryall on Thursday June 27, 2024 @11:22AM (#40811533)
NYT was right and AP has now corrected theirs. Reload and check errata at the bottom.
Re:Supreme Court blocks Purdue Pharma opioid settlement by SpicyLemonZest on Thursday June 27, 2024 @11:17AM (#40811480)
The NY times. The AP story seems to have just been corrected.
Re:Supreme Court blocks Purdue Pharma opioid settlement by ajdlinux on Thursday June 27, 2024 @11:02AM (#40811300)
You mean John Roberts instead of Ketanji Brown Jackson.
Re:Supreme Court blocks Purdue Pharma opioid settlement by dathayron on Sunday June 30, 2024 @09:40AM (#40837119)
The settlement was really a bit insane to me - we’re giving immunity to a family that killed hundreds of thousands and destroyed who knows how many more, and the money is being paid to local governments. In my area they planned on spending their share on things like “outreach” and free-to-the-addict narcan so they could continue to run around causing local mayhem.

Speaking as a man with a deceased father and aunt as a result of the Sacklers, really it’s a spit in the face kind of outcome that was shot down. They ought to be locked up next to El Chapo in ADX Florence.