A morass is certainly preferable to a calamity.
What the actions of world leaders have effectively said is that we will sacrifice our economic growth in exchange for the ability to ensure that current debt can continue to be serviced.
What the actions of world leaders have effectively said -- loud, clear, underlined and bolded -- is that the protection of existing wealth is of paramount importance and the generation of new wealth is secondary-to-incidental.
That said, one needs to know the breadth and depth of the impact of famine vs a typhoon to know which would be worse.
4 decades of famine that negatively affects half the population may be the lesser evil compared to 1 typhoon that outright destroys half the population and thus future economic potential.
A lot of people are living above their means or on a economy with no breathing room => I think this is a very bad strategy going forward.
Regarding my startup I am trying to build a profitable and sound business that targets the global market.
As for investments, pick your index, close your eyes to the ups and downs and pray someone in government realizes that when people are willing to give you a negative real interest rate you should take their money and do something productive with it.
The only way I'm able to interpret this as practical advice is "invest in the mafia". Unless you're talking about building up your personal skills - which, while good advice (if you can do something other people want then you'll never go hungry, no matter how bad the economy), doesn't really scale.