Call it what it is, torture.
Where’s the evidence that he was falsely accused?
I'd say that you could have found all this out yourself with Google, but you didn't even need to. All this info has already been linked in these comments.
Most of the links in these comments aren't authoritative in anyway
... Which weakens the oral evidence.
The only evidence they had; because there was no DNA found on the condom submitted as evidence.
https://medium.com/@njmelzer/demasking-the-torture-of-julian...
> There were never any formal criminal charges, and the Swedish Prosecution Authority’s investigation into Assange was dropped in November 2019 due to a lack of evidence.
https://rsf.org/en/rsf-dispels-common-misconceptions-case-ag...
Let an old spy go off and retire, he can't work anymore anyhow.
Example: Gerhard Schröder was also very obviously bought by Russians. He never went to jail nor was he hunted down.
Assange also did publish actual literal war crimes committed by the US. Not sure how you can just casually ignore that fact?
There's more to this.
1900 days in isolation (human rights violation), falsly accused of rape with the goal to extradite to the US, jailed outside of the US on behalf of the US (but not officially), and just the simple fact that a journalist gets jail time for exposing war crimes.
Yeah, this has nothing to do with law or justice. This is about a handful of people above the law trying to save their *sses. Anything could happen at this point.
Reminds me of when a foreign diplomatic aircraft (Equador) was forced to land in a foreign country (France), because the US thought Snowden might be on board. Remind me of the relevant law that allows for this please? lol