Re:Internet Archive forced to remove 500k books after publis...
by kjkjadksj on Saturday June 22, 2024 @01:44AM
(#40756603)
A lot of paid software is crap too.
Re:Internet Archive forced to remove 500k books after publis...
by johnnyanmac on Saturday June 22, 2024 @03:22AM
(#40757123)
Indeed. But you only need one magic product to capture a market. No one's neither jumping to nor contributing to GIMP in light of all the Adobe BS, even if they should be for the betterment of all.
Re:Internet Archive forced to remove 500k books after publis...
by throw10920 on Saturday June 22, 2024 @01:49AM
(#40756627)
I didn't state otherwise, and I'm not sure how that's relevant to my point.
If you replace "nobody" with "very few people" then the statement is mostly true. The vast majority of open source software is crap. Sure, a lot of it is passion projects made by enthusiasts, and there's nothing wrong with that from an artistic hobbyist standpoint, but the quality of the software is very low.
Good and successful open source software is, in terms of numbers, rare.
Furthermore, most good FLOSS has at least some companies providing financial support, if not being almost exclusively worked on by employees of a company selling non-FLOSS software to pay the salaries of those devs.
Developers putting in hard work to write quality software for free do exist, of course, and many of them are absolute gigachads, but they're dwarfed by those actually getting paid to write software.