Re:The Engineer Who Refused to Approve the Challenger Launch
by willcipriano on Friday June 21, 2024 @05:10PM
(#40753854)
Yeah the one were people attack the author rather than the idea because they aren't competent enough to do so.
Re:The Engineer Who Refused to Approve the Challenger Launch
by Loughla on Friday June 21, 2024 @06:01PM
(#40754297)
Objectivism, like many philosophies or political beliefs, only works in an absolute vacuum.
Maybe the one person who survives the first trip to Mars can practice it.
Re:The Engineer Who Refused to Approve the Challenger Launch
by willcipriano on Friday June 21, 2024 @06:12PM
(#40754387)
I'm not an objectivist. My comment is the extent of the Ayn Rand beliefs I hold for my most part.
When you work on ideas instead of personalities you get to do that.
Nobody here tried to disprove my comment. Just a few people starting complaining about a dead woman whose book I mentioned in passing.
They got together and argued, incompetently. Demonstrating the effect I was attempting to illustrate.
Re:The Engineer Who Refused to Approve the Challenger Launch
by johnnyanmac on Saturday June 22, 2024 @06:53AM
(#40757993)
i guess the true fate is the competent arguing amongst one another in an attempt to establish who is most competent, while the incompetent group together and bask in the real rewards. The goals of the incompetent are simple and tangible. The goals of the competent are abstract, as they seek acceptance from their fellow competent peers
Re:The Engineer Who Refused to Approve the Challenger Launch
by psunavy03 on Friday June 21, 2024 @05:16PM
(#40753906)
Objectivism: that fart-huffing philosophy that leads people to think everyone else is incompetent to judge it, when it's just a bunch of hateful trash that is to the right as Marxism is to the left.
That book?