News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:6.5 Million LinkedIn Password Hashes Leaked by jgrahamc on Wednesday June 06, 2012 @11:34AM (#4074403)
And.. the node.js solution doesn't do what either the Perl or shell one liners do. It doesn't tell you whether the password was found in the file. All it does is print out a SHA1 hash of a string.
Re:6.5 Million LinkedIn Password Hashes Leaked by dpritchett on Wednesday June 06, 2012 @11:44AM (#4074464)
That's a trivial modification:

    $ echo linkedin | xargs node -e "var x = require('crypto').createHash('sha1').update(process.argv[1]).digest('hex'); console.log(x.substring(5));" | xargs -I {} grep {} hashes.txt
I'm surprised at the backlash to what I thought was fun code golfing. No one called me names after I posted a simple Python solution that didn't check the file. For what it's worth I've changed my LI password and I haven't bothered downloading the actual hash file.
Re:6.5 Million LinkedIn Password Hashes Leaked by Gigablah on Wednesday June 06, 2012 @12:11PM (#4074598)
If I post a PHP solution maybe zxcvb will get a heart attack.
Re:6.5 Million LinkedIn Password Hashes Leaked by justinhj on Wednesday June 06, 2012 @12:19PM (#4074636)
node has a neat API for quickly knocking out stuff like this; it's a useful tool for more than just server code. Calling that comment fanboyism is just displaying the opposite of fanboyism, prejudice against hyped-up tools that nevertheless are good tools.
Re:6.5 Million LinkedIn Password Hashes Leaked by zxcvb on Wednesday June 06, 2012 @12:07PM (#4074585)
My point still stands. There's funny and then theres blatent fanboyism. You're like a prepubescent teenager who doesn't understand the context of social situations so always says something stupid.
Re:6.5 Million LinkedIn Password Hashes Leaked by sintaks on Wednesday June 06, 2012 @12:34PM (#4074727)
"Which brings us to the most important principle on HN: civility. Since long before the web, the anonymity of online conversation has lured people into being much ruder than they'd dare to be in person. So the principle here is not to say anything you wouldn't say face to face. This doesn't mean you can't disagree. But disagree without calling the other person names. If you're right, your argument will be more convincing without them."
Re:6.5 Million LinkedIn Password Hashes Leaked by icebraining on Wednesday June 06, 2012 @01:44PM (#4075078)
Some people actually do call names to others when face to face.

Personally, while I don't, I do tend to get a little aggressive and then I'm often surprised with the backlash, because I get that way when I'm genuinely enjoying the conversation, not when I'm irritated.

Re:6.5 Million LinkedIn Password Hashes Leaked by SkyMarshal on Wednesday June 06, 2012 @03:48PM (#4075802)
Tone doesn't carry on the Internet, so no one knows you're enjoying it. Hence, it generally degrades the quality of the conversation, which is the opposite of what we want at HN.
Re:6.5 Million LinkedIn Password Hashes Leaked by icebraining on Wednesday June 06, 2012 @08:23PM (#4076912)
No, I'm saying I do that face-to-face, and people still can't tell I'm enjoying it. So the tip to say nothing that you wouldn't say IRL is useless to me; I just can't help it.
Re:6.5 Million LinkedIn Password Hashes Leaked by freyr on Wednesday June 06, 2012 @01:13PM (#4074926)
"You're like a prepubescent teenager who doesn't understand the context of social situations..."

The hypocrisy is so unabashed my brain might explode.

Re:6.5 Million LinkedIn Password Hashes Leaked by betterth on Wednesday June 06, 2012 @01:43PM (#4075072)
Pot, meet kettle.