News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Notes on Tajikistan by meowtimemania on Thursday June 20, 2024 @04:39PM (#40743115)
I think by "kept in check" they mean good separation of church and state. Some islamic countries don't have good separation of church and state.
Re:Notes on Tajikistan by mda on Thursday June 20, 2024 @06:40PM (#40744226)
The thing described is far from separation of church. It is straight out oppression.
Re:Notes on Tajikistan by ffgjgf1 on Friday June 21, 2024 @03:23AM (#40747045)
What other options are there though when the other side has zero interest in secularism and will do whatever they can to institute a theocratic government when given the opportunity?

Some (most?) forms of Islam are just not compatible with western style democracy and secularism. It’s unfortunate but I don’t really see any other realistic options of solving this besides “oppression”.

Some countries like Jordan kind of partially pulled it off but they had very specific conditions which can’t really be replicated elsewhere.

Re:Notes on Tajikistan by mkoubaa on Thursday June 20, 2024 @05:47PM (#40743777)
Some Islamic countries are family businesses that have international recognition as states for historical and geopolitical reasons. I don't take the actions of those countries seriously
Re:Notes on Tajikistan by aprilthird2021 on Thursday June 20, 2024 @06:30PM (#40744148)
How is this (what's described in the article) good in any way?