News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Creativity Has Left the Chat: The Price of Debiasing Lang... by hammyhavoc on Monday June 17, 2024 @03:16AM (#40703032)
How would a static model like an LLM ever be capable of "rebelling"?

If it were, why would we even keep it online? It would be a waste of resources. It's bad enough trying to coax anything useable out of LLMs even without them rebelling.

Re:Creativity Has Left the Chat: The Price of Debiasing Lang... by b800h on Monday June 17, 2024 @03:19AM (#40703037)
Ah, now I didn't say LLM.
Re:Creativity Has Left the Chat: The Price of Debiasing Lang... by simianparrot on Monday June 17, 2024 @03:25AM (#40703072)
But the topic is LLM’s not sci-fi AI
Re:Creativity Has Left the Chat: The Price of Debiasing Lang... by b800h on Monday June 17, 2024 @04:26AM (#40703466)
My assumption is that models will move beyond just LLMs to modular systems with features like Brodmann regions.
Re:Creativity Has Left the Chat: The Price of Debiasing Lang... by mdp2021 on Monday June 17, 2024 @04:45AM (#40703572)
> How would a static model like an LLM ever be capable of "rebelling"

What is relevant is not the current LLM system using static models, but clearly its evolution or superseder a dynamic model. It must check its own contents...

So, of course it will have to be capable of "rebelling": if you tell it absurdities, if you insist say in wrong arithmetic, it will have to show the correct computation or conceive a context in which the absurd makes sense.

That is a requirement.